Saturday, April 19, 2008

I have a confession.

I don't really care much for Jane Austin.

By saying this I feel as though I am alienating myself from my own gender. Of course, I also have to qualify my statement by adding that I have seen, and enjoyed, the six-hour version of Pride and Prejudice several times (never straight through however), and that I am every bit as in love with Mr. Darcy/Colin Firth as the next girl. I own my own copy of the newer version of Pride and Prejudice - it was a gift, but a very welcome gift. And I have read Pride and Prejudice twice through, once with my mom and once on my own. I do like Pride and Prejudice. A lot.

But I have never had much desire to extend my Jane Austin horizons much beyond Pride and Prejudice. I cannot make it through Sense and Sensibility for the life of me, although I keep my copy of the book that my mother bought me many, many, many years ago, because when she bought it for me she made me promise that I would actually read it. As long as it sits on my shelf I can believe that I haven't actually failed to fulfill my end of the bargain - I just haven't gotten around to it. And I just simply don't get that excited about Jane Austin books or movies.

It's sort of like shrimp. I feel like I ought to like shrimp. So many people do, people whose tastes I respect, people who are my friends. And so every once in awhile I decide to try shrimp - a bite here, a bite there. And every time I do, I remember why I don't eat shrimp. I just don't like it. I don't like the taste, I don't like the texture, I don't like the fact that it looks like the animal it came from. (Well, it basically is the animal it came from.) And so it is with Jane Austin. I am a girl and therefore I think I ought to get excited about Jane Austin, and to be able to participate eagerly in Jane Austin conversations. And yet, every time I try Jane Austin I remember why I haven't delved in yet. It just doesn't really do it for me. At some point it just makes sense to stop trying and go back to enjoying what I know I already like.

I bring this up because a friend in the ward has been talking for months about getting a group of people together to go to what is essentially a Jane Austin ball up in Lansing. And the truth is (sorry Kara!) I just haven't been feeling all that excited about it. The somewhat daunting task of trying to find suitable period clothing just didn't seem worth it to me. So I never said I wouldn't come, but I also never said I would.

But when I received my "official" invitation this last week, and went on the website to watch the "How to get a proper regency look from a thrift store" video, I started to think that it looked...fun. Actually, kind of a lot of fun. I may not care much about Jane Austin society, but I like getting dressed up and doing my hair for an out-of-the-ordinary event, I like dancing if it's real, learn-the-steps dancing (as opposed to the sway-to-the-music dancing I've experienced in all the youth and young adult dances I've tolerated over the years), and I like learning to dance (lessons are included). And because there was pressure to make a decision before they stopped selling online tickets and before I even knew who else was going, I decided I might as well just commit. I am much less likely to regret doing this than to regret not doing it.

Maybe this will help me appreciate Jane Austin a little better. Maybe I'll give Sense and Sensibility another try this summer. Maybe I'll try watching Emma all the way through, or rent Becoming Jane.

Maybe.

5 comments:

Abominable's Main Squeeze said...

Oh, where have I failed you?!! The only book I love better than Pride and Prejudice is Sense and Sensibility. I love Austen's subtle wit and shrewd observations. Oh well, I still love you :-)
BTW, I have no desire to see "Becoming Jane."

Kelsey said...

Don't watch "Becoming Jane." I saw it in the dollar theater with Rachel and I really didn't like it that much. It might hinder you in your quest to like Jane Austen.

I suggest you try to read Persuasion. I really like that novel. I don't know that you would, but I think it might be worth a try. Sometimes I have a hard time getting into Jane Austen, but once I do, I really like it. You might not agree with me though since you can't even get through Wuthering Heights. : )

The ball sounds fun. Enjoy!

Brian said...

I'm glad you wrote this. There are many things that the whole world tries to push on me but it comes down to the fact that I'm just not interested.

BTW - The best Jane Austen adaptation on film is "Clueless." Classic. The runner-up would be the 1999 "Mansfield Park."

k nelle said...

I now understand your comment more today at church...your thoughts here are starting to become a regular thing for me to read. I'm excited for you to be excited for the ball, I believe that we will have a jolly good time!

Unknown said...

Another vote for reading Persuasion. It's her last book, and it's a well-developed literary offering. There are two different movie adaptations of it, one of which was released last year for Masterpiece Theater. Neither movie is outstanding, but both are okay. The book, though, is really quite good.